But are we actually seeing what's going on?
Please. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain...
It has been a week since my last post for several reasons - not the least of which being the need to complete work and meet necessary funding deadlines in order to keep my day job. I have had to be careful what I say and what research work I publish in the last year for fear of yet again being constructively dismissed. I have recently had one human herd animal call me a ‘dirty anti-vaxxer’ because she saw I had been named as an author on something published recently that demonstrated that the ONS death-by-vaccination data was clearly full of errors and deceptively misleading. Another ‘called me out’ for using a media article headline from covid times as an uncontentious example to demonstrate a common math issue (the difference between actual risk reduction and relative risk reduction - or ARR vs RRR) to postgraduate students. She demanded I remove that example from my slide deck because it might cause emotional distress to what were fully grown adults (and hopefully not, snowflakes) if they see anything at all about Covid getting - even legitimately - called into question.
For these people I am certain that as more and more information comes out showing politicians, globalists, pharmaceutical companies and others lied to us, they would prefer we buried our heads in the sand and carried on like nothing happened rather than acknowledge the whole thing was at best questionable…
Law, Health and Technology Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
And at worst…
This article is going to take you on a journey along exactly that theme… and show you how, as we pay attention to whatever is the ‘current thing’ (kissing politicians, cake eating politicians, Ukraine war, Lab leak, Black Lives Matter) we completely miss the fact that our most important rights: freedom of expression, freedom of movement, freedom to decide what our children are exposed to, and even freedom of thought, are ALL being systemmatically stolen from right under our very noses.
Like many, my employment and income was negatively impacted by the Covid-19 malarky. However, unlike most, those close to me know that I was constructively dismissed1 and by effect, forced to move on from three jobs during Covid-19. For no other reason than because I dared to be sceptical of the Covid-19 narrative and had the temerity to continue to work with other more prominent sceptics and publish work, and blog posts, and tweets… and co-author letters to those in power.
Time and time again our group has demonstrated that the whole Covid-19 narrative was being run like a drunken three ring circus and the general public were being misled about the true safety of the trapeze as different acrobats fell into their globalist-funded safety nets. It seems though, that daring to speak the truth meant I was guilty of the dreaded thoughtcrime.
Remember this little aside into Thoughtcrime… It isn’t some Orwellian conspiracy theory. What has happened to me and others is exactly what the globalists and our governments want to happen to all of you. We will return to discussion of thoughtcrime later.
It might be time to move on
During the last week I have watched as several groups of very intelligent people get bogged down, yet again, in another feculent release from the UK’s Office of National Statistics (ONS).
They are right, of course. And they’ve had some significant wins. The ONS staff like to pretend they are doing it right even as they double-dip and play loosely with the numbers. But some on our side of the fence seemed positively shocked that the ONS would not only release yet more carefully massaged and manipulated figures, but that as questions about those suspicious statistics would start to be questioned, the ONS would follow them up with an even more questionable report and some very exposing tweets.
I mean, it isn’t like they havent pulled all of these same dirty tricks several times before… is it? Senior qualified mathematicians have been exposing the questionable nature of our ‘official Covid-19 statistics’ since mid-2020. So now, almost three years on, one might be forgiven for simply thinking “we know they can’t be trusted” and moving on to more pressing matters.
But, apparently not.
Similarly, during 2022 the Midazolam scandal was exposed… yet that is still a headline today. I acknowledge that even in the face of unquestionably strong evidence that 10% of our elderly died during the same month that Nice Guideline NG163 was implemented and Midazolam, Haloperidol and opiate prescriptions by GPs increased by as much as 400% or more, there are still some unscrupulous mainstream journalists pretending it never happened…
But I am certain that, just like her WhatsApp Revelations articles in the Telegraph, this is yet another in the long line of distractions meant to draw your attention to whatever is shiniest or making the most noise, and away from something far more sinister and important.
So, at the same time that many very smart but otherwise distracted researchers go ‘round and round in circles’ re-exposing the same State-led covid scams that we have already been exposing for some time, they actually give me the impression that they’ve also completely lost any sense of what is actually going on around us and right under their very noses.
Nothing against anyone in the tweets I have reproduced… this is a general observation, not a personal attack. It is also exactly what the globalists and our governments want to happen. They are controlling the daily narrative to ensure you keep thinking about the things that they want you to be think about… while ignoring the things they are actually doing behind the curtain.
So… What ARE we missing?
There are so many answers to this question… and the sad truth is that the mainstream media fact checkers will tell you all of them are ‘conspiracy theories’.
Until they aren’t.
But remember, they also said vaccine passports were a conspiracy theory… until we were told we needed one to travel. Vaccine mandates were a conspiracy theory… until jabs were mandated for care home staff. Myocarditis as an adverse event to the Covid-19 vaccines was an anti-vaxxer conspiracy theory… until at some point it just wasn’t. The notion that the LNP and spike protein jab particles left the injection site was a conspiracy theory… until post mortems found them all over the body. Even more importantly, the belief that the spike protein in the jabs crossed the blood-brain barrier was an anti-vaxxer conspiracy theory… until post mortems found spike proteins (sans the viral sheath) that could only have come from the jabs in the brains of deceased people.
So the lesson here is that as far as the mainstream media fact checkers are concerned, anything negative about the jabs is a conspiracy theory…
Until their globalist funders graciously let them admit it isn’t.
Also… The list of non-Covid ‘distractions’ includes:
The war in the Ukraine.
How much of our tax money has been diverted to the Ukraine? and how much was then diverted back out of the Ukraine either as political donations to politicians, cash, or weapons bound for Bangladesh? For example, even as strong evidence pointed to a financial link between Sam Bankman-Fried’s FTX and the Bank of Ukraine, and suggested a financial partnership with the Ukraine government (here), and that at least $50mil that may have been given to the Ukrainian war effort by our governments had been syphoned back from the Ukraine through FTX and Bankman-Fried into Democratic candidate donations accounts, including Biden’s (here, here), the fact checkers would have you believe none of this ever happened. Besides… if the donations were not questionable, why would they give any (even this pawltry 2%) of it back? And let’s not forget that the Ukrainian President is a soap actor and questionable alphabet soup singer with a sketchy past, is suggested to have had some help being ‘installed’ to the presidency by globalists, and has spent more of the so-called war away from his country and people, jet-setting around the world to get photo opportunities with heads of state (here, here and here) and royals anywhere he can get a leg up. It’s a grand show… but I suspect that’s all it has ever been. A show.
The 2020 ‘summer protests’
As RuminatorDan described today, the George Floyd summer protests were like a made for the movies moment:
The director yelled CUT and everyone suddenly dropped the Covid-19 narrative like a hot potato and walked off set. Black Lives Matter came onto set and filmed their scenes. Then the director called us all back from our break and shouted ROLLING: COVID AGAIN!
While some argued Antifa was not a terrorist ‘group’ due to their decentralised nature, and others liked to proclaim Antifa an agent for good (fighting against opression, fascism, racism… peace and quiet), what is clear is that anything good should not include violence against people and property. Yet, even while the media and fact checkers painted Donald Trump in a bad light for the tweet above, a Congressional Research Service report acknowledged that Antifa members had a long history of violence against people, property and governments with whom they disagreed. Even the German government supported Trump’s efforts in America to classify Antifa as terrorists. It seemed the only odd-one-out who disagreed were the globalist-funded journalists?
The NHS Overwhelm story
The “won’t you please stay at home because the NHS will be overwhelmed” scandal started with the Neil Ferguson can’t math fiasco. Yes… that’s right… Mr Multiplication himself initiated the idea that 500,000 people would die from Covid-19 in the UK in just the first 6 weeks and the poor little NHS was going to be overrun with all these covid cases.
We all know how that played out.
Consultants and much of the outpatient clinic and elective surgery brigade took a free holiday on furlough, happily collecting their NHS pay while (in some cases) refusing to even answer the phone. We now know that intensive care units were never actually overwhelmed with covid patients and that stories were manufactured to give the false impression that unvaccinated Covid-19 infected children and pregnant women were filling ICUs and hospital wards. Staff who were present in many cases outnumbered patients three-to-one. This was even my own experience when I had to go to hospital. There were three nurses to usher me around, take down my history and sit with me while waiting for the poor overworked newly minted registrar to come attend to my needs. That new doctor was about 25, absolutely wonderful, and sweet as a button - and after seeing that I was a lecturer and health researcher in a related health field, she quietly told me that she had spent the day in and out of theatre doing things that she did not feel ready or confident to be doing on her own, because her consultant ‘didn’t want to come in to the hospital’. Many nurses and midwives spent their time recording tiktok videos. For one Kent NHS this meant over 100 staff doing a coreographed dance in the hospital carpark that in a ‘how to’ video they admitted took them a week to learn. A week on their public salaries that you and I pay taxes to cover. And in another location, this meant midwives and nurses spending your tax dollar and mine doing this oddly sexual dance to kill time between the overwhelming number of non-existent covid-19 patients…
Excellent use of some very expensive hospital equipment there ladies. One hopes nothing got broken and that everything was cleaned or steralised and put back ready for when it was needed for the serious business of actually providing healthcare?
Busy making TikToks!
Lab Leak versus Wet Market
Don’t get me started on the number of times they’ve tried to distract us with the gain-of-function Lab Leak versus Wuhan Wet Market nonsense. And somewhere in the middle of it was the Ukrainian Virology Labs versus UN/NATO thing that went away as fast as it came. First it was lab. Then it wasn’t. Now, thanks to the supposed investigations of groups with absolutely no qualification or skin in the game like the Department of Energy, it’s lab again.
Threats of power cuts
In October 2022 the UK government and energy suppliers promoted stories in the mainstream media that electricity rationing and rolling power cuts were imminent. The looming lack of energy replaced Covid-19 (and even the Ukrainian mumbo jumbo) as the dominant story attracting the public’s attention at that time.
While stories about people losing their electricity supply and grannies unable to heat their homes were observed (no different to any other year really), the culprit was cost, not lack of supply. It seemed that as long as you were willing to pay the exhorbinant new charges for electricity, there was plenty to go around. Not only did the then pro tem prime minister Truss’ promise of capped household energy bills come to a needlessly complicated nothing, the windfall tax she said she wouldn’t do came to fruition and simply led to power companies charging customers even more in order to cover it while ensuring shareholders didn’t lose out. In the end households who could least afford it got a minor chicken-feed ‘handout’ credit on their electricity bills from the right hand, while the left hand simply put energy prices up by more than 66 percent over an 8 month period to cover the cost.
Do you see how they’re leading you by the nose yet?
So if these are the things they want you to be thinking about… what is it they don’t really want you to see?
What should we be paying attention to?
That last item (threats of power cuts) is a great example of both a distraction, and the type of subterfuge the distractions are being used to help you to avoid seeing. It is similar to the type of bait-and-switch John Howard used in Australia in 1998 to get elected…
Even though ever since 1979 the imposition of a GST (a so-called consumption tax) had been on his political agenda - and had been a prime reason he had never been voted into office, Little Johnny Howard famously won the 1998 election by completely and absolutely ruling out the introduction of a GST.
And all Australians know how well that turned out. He hadn’t been in office a full term before the ‘A New Tax System’ Goods and Services Tax (GST) was announced and the country was rushing headlong into the year 2000 complete change-over of the existing sales tax system (and one that actually managed to allow many of the other underlying import duties and taxes to continue… meaning the Austalian people got shafted twice). He only managed to stay in office because of political alliances with the National Party (and others). I wonder how well his promises to those political ‘allies’ worked out in the long run? I wouldn’t trust him to sell me a used car… let alone accept one of his political IOUs.
However, the list of things I believe we should, and they don’t want us to, be paying attention to and fighting back against instead of continuing to play Covid-19 Whack-a-Mole includes indoctrination of children, university students and the unwashed masses with gender, race, politics and climate ideologies:
The Trans Issues
We could simply be referring to the fact that men claiming to be women (and ironically the women that support them) are doing everything they can to erase the distinction that is ‘woman’ from the face of the earth - including even from having their genetic material involved in the making of babies. In fairness, the same was proposed for lesbian couples in 2017 and thee was an uproar then that men would no longer be necessary. At least in this more recent scenario where the DNA of two men are used to make a baby, a woman still has to be present (at least until the Brave New World of ex utero gestation is discovered) to gestate the child.
In any event, we all started seeing the trans issue creeping into academic institutions during the last decade. Everyone on campus is encouraged to be supportive ‘allies’ of students who express gender diverse tendencies… and when that doesn’t work, anyone questioning the ideology is accused of a ThoughtCrime and can face severe consequences (just ask professors and teachers like Kathy Stock, Kevin Lister and Christy Hammer). Some argue that the college or undergraduate university campus has become a cult - indoctrinating students with the gender and woke ideology madness so that they will go on to infect future workplaces and their own children.
Primary and High Schools all around the world have now been infiltrated by this new breed of university-indoctrinated trans and gender confused young teachers who are pushing what many, I believe quite rightly, describe as a mental health issue onto our children. The confusing nonsense these young and often colourfully quaffed teachers push (see here, here, here, here, here and here) onto our impressionable young children not only looks like madness, it has helped to create a new and even more devisive trans issue as supposedly ‘qualified’ people are claiming to see ‘trans’ tendencies even in newborns and 24 month old infants. Even worse, parents are now using social media to draw all sorts of attention to themselves by claiming their four or six year old child who could not credibly have any real understanding of such issues, has come out as ‘trans’. When many teens and adults like Chloe Cole, Elle, Helena Kerschner, Debbie, and Charlie Evans who have ‘transitioned’ go on to regret the decision and the hormonal and surgical mutilations visited upon them in the name of medical science… it is not surprising that we are now seing parents who got caught up in the trans hysteria going on to regret letting their very young child change genders.
And don’t get me started on the recent trend for allowing drag queens and men claiming to be trans into primary and high schools - where they argue with kids who disagree with them about the ridiculous number of fake genders that are now proliferating the mainstream, show 11 year old girls how a skin graft is used to create a fake and otherwise useless penis, and people in authorities overlook barring and disclosure checks and entirely miss that some drag queens and trans ‘visitors’ they are allowing to dance and read books to our children are actually sex offenders (here, here and here). But according to some journalists, pointing this out to you is homophobia. This obsession with sexualisation of our children in schools and the mainstream media is sick and disgusting.
The obsession with calling any parent who doesn’t want their children exposed to this brain garbage ‘transphobic’, ‘homophobic’ or tin-foil hat conspiracy theorists is just yet another way that globalists and governments are dividing us. Which again, is what they want.
The Racism Issues
Racial division has become the most used tool used by politicians, universities, employers, the mainstream media and misguided people everywhere. For these people, Dr Lyell Asher describes racial division as both the sworn enemy, and the secret friend - and keeping race front and centre allows them to cause intentional harm while also offering the cure to heal. Racism is constantly being promoted as the cause for what are often completely unrelated and ridiculous issues. Often what is really going on is the promotion of a single utterly ridiculous political social justice idea: That present day racism against one group is the solution for redress of historic racism against another. We can see the operation of this nonsense in the way that heterosexual white males are now being demonised (see here, here, here and here) and discriminated against in the name of ‘diversity’ - whether it is a pause in recruitment offers to white males by employers including the UK RAF, or the proliferation of BAME employment targets that means immutable characterstics now mean more than qualification or experience (see here, here, here, and here). We have even seen university departments pushing the boat out for diversity hires based on racial characteristics rather than qualification - and the embarassing mistakes that brings when properly qualified white men and women are overlooked in favour of ensuring an increase in the percentage of BAME staff on campus - no matter their qualifications or criminal history in their home country (for example, here).
While websites like Wikipedia would like you to believe Critical Race Theory (CRT) is some type of fairminded examination of social, political and legal structures to ensure equity for all people, CRT disingenuously uses the concept of white supremacy to indoctrinate children into socialism and Marxism. Children are taught about ‘white privilege’ and ‘inherited guilt’ - that white students ‘receive an invisible package of unearned assets’ because of their white skin, and that black and brown students, even those from wealthy families with parents who are doctors and lawyers, are experiencing current opression and are worse off compared to any white person today because their ancestors were traded as slaves. This ridiculous position is blind to the fact that there are poor and underprivieged, and even homeless people of every colour, including white, and that when you look at a class full of children like that which my child was in when introduced to CRT - many of the brown and black children came from very wealthy families… certainly wealthier than ours has ever been. The white-bashing of CRT has become endemic in UK schools and universities in spite of even coloured politicians decrying it as illegal (here and here).
Again, it’s what the globalists and governments want. A divided people arguing about race is the perfect way to create yet another Hegalian Dilectic that they can step in and solve by locking us down in our own little ‘patch’.
The Environmental Issues
Over the last 50+ years we have been variously told that we are all going to die from global warming, a global ice age, climate change, rising sea levels that aren’t or some other climate-related disaster. The funny thing is that each time they’ve predicted the climate apocalypse…
It hasn’t come?!?!?
In 1975 Wallace Broecker put the term Global Warming into our social consciousness with an academic paper titled ‘Climate change: Are we on the brink of pronounced global warming?’ The introduction of that paper actually starts by telling us that there is presently a ‘cooling trend’ and that he, Broecker, predicts that the preceeding three decades of climatic cooling has been compensating for the effect of man, and that during the following decade (from 1975-1985) this will give way to a ‘warming trend’ due to the ‘carbon dioxide effect’. His prediction is made not on scientific evidence or principles, but on his own created and unproven assumption that 50% of all CO2 ‘stays in the atmosphere’. He even gives us one of the first, and crudest, examples of the now infamous hockey-stick graph.
Can you see it?… that silly looking CO2 effect line? You can create any powerful message to fool the ignorant from carefully couched blind assumptions…
We are currently being told (yet again) that we’ve hit peak oil, and that this, and the net zero climate agenda, means we need to ‘transition’ to clean energy production. However, how is this any different from the other ten or so times simce WW1 that they incorrectly told us we had, but didn’t, hit the so-called ‘peak oil’ mark?
Politicians present ‘clean energy’ alternatives like solar and wind power as though they are already capable of meeting our entire energy needs… but this is a complete and utter lie. They use this lie to sugar coat their globalist funder’s net zero carbon policies, but avoid telling us the truth… that after more than 25 years, wind and solar barely meet 8% of global electricity production, and don’t even reach 4% of our total global energy need.
Even if we were to drastically increased our production of wind and solar generation capacity (and we probably cannot without creating even greater pollution) - to something closer to triple the current annual rate. In another 25 years we could still not even meet 25% of our total energy production needs from these so-called ‘clean energy’ sources.
Electric cars create more carbon emissions and other toxic pollution in their production and use (from lithium mining to daily use) - and even if we ignore that all you are doing is shifting the energy production source (and pollution) from inside the car (engine) to somewhere half-way across the country. But the majority can never break even on the pollution from their manufacture before the battery fails and needs to be replaced. It is my belief that electric, and especially hybrid, cars were introduced to make cars even more expensive, out of reach for the common person, and disposable. Already we are seeing that as people wake up to the idiot tax that is the bricked car that needs an expensive battery replacement after 5-7 years, resale of internal combustion only models of the same vehicle are holding greater resale value (here, here and here).
Even worse, most people are too ignorant of the issues to realise that the things they are taking away from us when they limit our access to fossil fuels - the freedom to go places in our cars, to fly overseas for a holiday, to cheaply cook and heat our home, won’t actually make an appreciable difference to the amount of carbon being generated…
The dreaded evil Aviation only accounts for 1.9% of all global emissions - from which less than one sixth (0.3%) is related to passenger transport. Road transport accounts for 11.9% of global emissions - from which, once you exclude heavy goods haulage, courier delivery and emergency and military vehicle usage, less than one quarter (2.8%) is related to personal vehicle usage. So even if they remove all access to fossil-fuel powered personal air travel and car ownership from the general population like the WEF, Bill Gates, King Charles and our governments want, this draconian measure is only going to reduce global emissions by a little over 3% - and that doesn’t account for the fact that more of us will then be getting around on busses and in taxis… so the real net reduction will probably be closer to 1%.
Do you think they are destroying our way of life, and that of our children and grandchildren, for the sake of a massive 1% reduction in global carbon emissions?
Or might it be something else?
We simply cannot afford to follow the Net Zero climate narrative. The WEF/Bill Gates sponsored Net Zero Carbon policy will result in an energy dark age… and I am certain that those who say the rich globalists and royals will have all the energy they want while the rest of us huddle in our cold, damp and dark hovels are probably correct. Given he owns four jets, a sea plane and a helicopter, I can’t see Bill Gates going without.
They also want to take away our access to eat meat because, they say, meat production produces far too much carbon. Go back and look at the circular graph. Livestock and their associated manure only account for 5.8% of total global carbon emissions, and little more than a quarter of all agriculture and land use. Their solutions are a combination of ‘going vegan’ (so increasing crop production which means a greater share from agricultural soils, cultivation and cropland) and factory made/lab grown ‘fake foods’ (which will require increased energy use and create more pollutants). They don’t even account yet for the new carbon created from the WEF and Bill Gates’ other wizz-bang idea - insect farming. At best, all they are doing is shifting the source from one (livestock) to several others that are potentially greater carbon-polluters (crop farming, insect farming, and factory and lab production). Again I ask you… do you think they are really doing this to shave off a measly couple of percentage points in global carbon emissions?
Or might it be something else?
the environmental issue allows them to continue to divide us. Supposedly climate loving restrictionists on one side, climate deniers on the other. Another Hegalian Dilectic that’s ripe for globalist and government intervention… perhaps now they can lock us down in our own little ‘patches’?
The 15 Minute City
While it could be included in the Environmental Issues section, I am going to call BS on the 15 minute city policies seperately. (NB: they are also sometimes called the 20 minute neighbourhood)
We are told that the 15 minute city is a concept that reimagines urban spaces, promoting the idea of mixed-use, community-based and environmentally-friendly infrastructure and development. The modern-day 15 minute city concept is the brainchild of the WEF, or more specifically, WEF member Carlos Moreno. His idea is to pen us all in together like cattle in small local urban areas, and the WEF love to present it as though they are doing you a favour while clearly looking at you as though you owe them rent.
This will make it far more difficult and time consuming for people to get around anywhere outside their little community, and has the potential to mean that more of us will be born, live and die in an area with an 800 metre radius - little more than half a square kilometre. The WEF even want you to believe that you asked for this totalitarian socialist nonsense. While the WEF and some councils (here) would have you believe that, for now at least, they don’t intend to restrict your movement outside your allotted ‘community area’, it is clear from some of the bolder proposed implementations that restriction of movement initially through anti-motorist enviro-woke fines is definitely part of the overall package - although there was no mention of it in the public consultation brochure.
The question you have to ask yourself is this…
If councils are going to propose these un-gated ‘gated’ communities, and some will impose fines for driving your car into or out of that community, how long will it be before all councils introduce the same anti-motorist fines and how long will it be before the gates do actually go up?
But of course, the fact checkers and journalists said it is all conspiracy theories. And it will remain so until it affects them… or their children. Even as they are telling us that the exact things they are doing are all a conspiracy theory - they look for all the world like hostages under someone else’s control (blink, man, if you need help!). How long before we are all hostages in our own homes?
Almost every modern western country has, or is about to, release the first of a number of digital citizen projects - the digital drivers license. Leaving aside less tangible situations that could arise when verification systems or network access are inaccessible, the potential for privacy and security issues must not be overlooked. Companies that develop digital identification and driver’s license systems for State authorities play on public fears by overstating privacy risks of your existing physical driver’s license in common situations such as using it as proof-of-age ID at a night club, while endorsing the software engine they sell to governments by understating any potential privacy and security risks that digital apps on smartphones are commonly seen to have, and claiming their product has impregnable security and unassailable privacy. This style of privacy and security gaslighting was also made about the software engine (in that case described as an advanced programming interface or API) supplied by Apple and Google for the recent contact tracing smartphone Apps. In each case a State authority produced a locally customised contact tracing App for citizens to download, but numerous privacy breaches occurred involving both the State- customised App and the underlying Google/Apple API, including: (a) log files containing personal information that users were told in press releases would not be stored locally but were actually found to be accessible in plain text by other Apps on the mobile device; (b) the ability for State intelligence and law enforcement to identify and freely collect what was supposed to be securely encrypted App data while it was in-transit on the internet; and, (c) State authorities profiting by selling App user’s location data using the device’s Google Advertising ID. These breaches of public privacy and trust underline why every citizen should be wary of not just the push to move our identification and driver licensing into these digital platforms, but also, as several governments have proposed, the merging of digital identification and other services like vehicle registration, contact tracing, vaccine certification, medical records and even access to money into a single or government-controlled smartphone App.
It is said that people carry their entire lives in their smartphones: that we have become human snails carrying our home in our pockets. Most people have a multitude of private information including their location history, text messages and emails that they would not wish read by anyone else. Almost half of all smartphone users, some as young as 14, have sexually explicit selfie images on their devices. Few, if any, would want to hand over their unlocked smartphone to a stranger, and especially not one who is a police officer - yet this is exactly what you will be required to do once you accept digital drivers licenses and digital ID.
Governments and law enforcement agencies have actively sought to compel the unlocking of private citizen’s digital devices for at least the last decade. In 2018 Australia and New Zealand enacted legislation allowing them to not only search digital devices at the border, but also to compel disclosure of passwords with large fines for non-compliance. Recent law changes in some Australian states made it a criminal offence to refuse to supply passcodes where police have compelled production. Often, very little justification is required to instantiate a search of your devices, and there have been several very public cases where people have refused to provide passcodes (here, here and here). However, when people have complied and provided passcode, fingerprint or face-ID to unlock the device, not all officers have acted with integrity, or even common decency. For example, some officers have sent and replied to messages using the person’s device and then deleted evidence and sought to deny their malfeasance, while others have forwarded nude selfies found on attractive female suspect’s phones to themselves or other officers (here, here and here).
The shift to digital identification and driver’s licenses might seem in vogue given our current generation of young people’s proclivity for adopting smart technology. The Australian and UK governments are both developing legislation under ostensibly similar draft digital identity Bills. Such digital identity laws will usher in an even more invasive digital surveillance age where the government is more able to centrally monitor every online interaction. Having already begun the process with introduction of Covid passports, track and trace digital check- in, and DDL; these digital identities will be central to every single person’s life and have been described publicly as a license to live. However, the risks involved in shifting to digital-only identification and any potential ulterior motives of some government and law enforcement actors should give us pause. Do we want to be completely reliant on what has and will always be poorly designed, inherently unreliable and easily exploited State-run technology? What effect would it have on your ability to access other services that require identification if your DDL is your primary State-issued identification and the App service is either not working, buggy or your access has been restricted? How long will it be before, as was suggested by Bank of England officials for the United Kingdom’s recently promoted digital currency, the government starts making decisions about when and where you can access or use your DDL, and hence drive - restricting it for disciplinary, social, supposed environmental or other reasons?
Online Harms, Online Safety and Similar Censorship Bills
While ostensibly claiming to be about making the internet safe for all users by requiring internet site providers to regulate content on their platforms (and how well has that worked during the last 3 years?), the online safety bills proposed in the UK, America, Canada and Australia are actually all about censorship. Censorship of thoughts and speech that the political aparatus of the day doesn’t want you to see. Leaving aside that complete censorship of the internet is something that is patently impossible no matter how the thought police think they can control it, these proposed laws go beyond the powers allowed in other acts (like the legislative powers act, investagotory powers act and so on) and contain no safeguards to ensure the the privacy and fundamental rights of citizens are protected. Most of these Bills will amount to state-mandated surveillance of even private conversations between two (or more) individuals, and will work hand in glove with recent misguided and misleading laws proposed and in some cases enacted by governments to require back door access into encryption mechanisms. Mass surveillance of the type Orwell proposed (and that we already know has been happening for some time) will become ubiquitous for everyone - and attempts to create or improvise your own encryption tools to prevent their imposition into your private lives will very likely be met with severe fines and imprisonment. In the name of safety, nothing will be secret.
The real question is what will they be wanting to censor? During Covid-19 we’ve seen people censored and censured sometimes even for doing nothing more than liking an uncontentious post by someone else on social media. Also, millions of pounds of your tax dollars are being spent on research to help police officers and public figures to monitor and protect themselves and their families from hurty words, threats, and exposing themselves unnecessarily because they are doing something wrong online (and from the imposition of these draconian totalitarian socialist legislations that the rest of us will be subject to) (see here).
Given we’ve already seen how well police impose censorship for the Government and activist groups (here, here, here and here), how well do you think a new and more pervasive censorship police state will work out for you?
So there you have it…
It was a long and winding road through dark forests and fording almost impassable streams. But we are finally here. The globalists running the show, and politicians running us, are playing out one narrative in the mainstream media, while setting up all the elements of our demise in another that is less overt.
White children are told they carry the privilege and guilt of their ancestors and must give up any - even hard fought - advantages, while black and brown children are given a sense of entitlement and all the advantages - whether they earn it or not. This narrative divides us along racial lines - and makes one group’s uncontrollable and immutable characteristics a crime to be punished.
All children, no matter what race or ethnicity, are being brainwashed and manipulated by the new generation of ‘educator’ who is simultaneously the least smartest and most mental health challenged person in the room, and who indoctrinates our kids into believing there are
50, 60, 70, now 73 different ways to say ‘boy’ or ‘girl’, that because Tim likes to sit and play games with Julie that means he is really a girl in a boy’s body. This narrative divides us along gender lines - and has created the Libs of TikTok generation where our kids feel the only way they can get noticed is to dye their hair purple and claim newer and ever more ridiculous neo-pronouns that even they don’t actually understand.
Over the last few decades we’ve had to negotiate the ‘womens’ and ‘me too’ movements - where men were told on the basis of the acts of a few, that they were all rapists and sex fiends. However, straight men are still under attack. This narrative also divides us along gender lines - and made it a crime in some cases for a guy to even approach a girl he liked and ask her for a date - lest he be slapped with a sexual harassment claim.
At the same time another narrative told us to accept and promote gays and lesbians in education or the workplace - to celebrate their ‘diversity’ in our culture no matter what their behaviour. A husband giving a wife a peck on the cheek was unacceptable in the workplace, but a homosexual man grabbing another on the butt cheek almost always went unchallenged. The strange thing was that in most places, the acts of an akward guy trying to ask a girl out that could result in loud protestations of sexual harassment were overlooked where it was a same sex individual performing the same act. That was okay. It was allowed because we were celebrating their ‘diversity’. This narrative divided us along sexual preference lines - and made it a crime to be straight.
What people have failed to notice is that as these EDI policies are implemented by governments, institutions and workplaces - they are deliberately implemented unfairly in order to divide us.
The war is on white people - because it is okay to discriminate against whites if you are doing so to offer BAME an advantage.
The war is on heterosexuality - because it is okay to discriminate against heterosexuals if in doing so you are encouraging more people to give up their heterosexuality and find it cool (or the only uncontested option) to become gay or trans.
A heterosexual man couldn’t go into a classroom full of 11 year olds and simulate heterosexual sexual movements, but it is okay for a gay or trans man in tight women’s leotards and little else to gyrate suggestively to music in front of them because ‘drag’ or ‘trans’?
Yeah, whatever. Not in front of my children.
And because we are told that to speak out against the woke narratives (ethnicity, diversity and inclusion, unconscious bias blah blah blah) means we are racist, homophobic, transphobic or some other negative stereotype label - at best, people are just looking at the floor and moving along. At worst, we now see parents actually taking their children to see and participate in these child sexualisation and exploitation shows - in some cases I suspect simply because they don’t want to be branded with one of those negative stereotypical labels.
As a society we need to rise up. We need to wrest control back from the globalists and politicians and set the course of our communities on a righteous path. We need to remind globalists that just because they are rich, doesn’t mean they are our masters. We need to remind politicians that we elect thm to serve us, not make us subservient to their bought-and-paid-for policies.
And no, setting things right doesn’t mean culling our communities of anyone we don’t agree with. As long as what you are, do or believe doesn’t directly harm others then live and let live. For example, we definitely shouldn’t tolerate the current undertone of sexualisation of children under the false flag of tolerance and diversity… nor should we allow ‘friends of the playground’ trying to molest our ‘pudding people’ - thanks Sydney Watson.
While our attention is being distracted by inconsequential shiny things, we are completely missing the fact that we are being divided into groups, herded together and penned up like cattle. We are most definitely being depopulated - any fact checker denying this is completely and utterly bought or is wilfully blind to the the evidence. We are being manipulated and controlled. Our children are being deliberately confused, brainwashed and sexualised. They are being manipulated into believing that the only way they can be happy is to be gay, trans, non-binary or asexual and not to question anything that they are told by teachers or the government. The globalists want to be the single source of everything in our lives - we will eat what we are told because our food will come from their labs and insect ‘factory farms’; we will live and die when they say because our health and immune systems will come regularly from their pharma companies in a syringe; we will learn and know only what they tell us because our access to information will come via their heavily censored and manipulated networks; and we will experience only what is within our local area because we will be managed within gated 15 minute cities and will need special permission and passes to move outside our small half-kilometre square community space.
If this is the type of ‘managed life’ you want. Do nothing - because it is already coming. If not, stop playing whack-a-mole with the ‘narrative of the day’ and become aware of what the man behind the curtain is really doing. Fight back.
And don’t believe the journalist fact checkers. Anything they call a conspiracy theory is probably something you really need to be aware, and afraid, of.
The Law, Health and Technology Newsletter is 100% subscriber supported. If you like my content, please consider becoming a paying subscriber and enable me to continue to produce this important content.
Constructive dismissal means that even though your employer did not say you were fired, the employer’s behaviour forces you to leave your employment. In this situation the termination of your employment may be at the initiative of the employer.
If your employer tells you that you have been dismissed, it is very clear that the termination of your employment was at the initiative of the employer. However, in some cases an employer may not say ‘you’re sacked’, but may still force an employee to leave because of the things the employer does or fails to do. That is, an employer may treat an employee so badly that their conduct fundamentally breaches the employment contract between the employer and the employee, leaving the employee with no reasonable option but to leave their employment. This is what is known as a ‘constructive dismissal.’