Today I am going to post the first of a two-part deep-dive into the issue of Pregnant Women, Covid-19 and the Intensive Care Unit. In order to do this I need to remind you of a little history and show you who was involved and what they were telling us. Their statements, whether made in the mainstream media, on social media or in academic papers, consisted primarily of fearmongering that pregnant women were getting Covid-19 in significant numbers, filling our ICUs, and simply had to take the Covid-19 vaccines or face imminent and near certain death.
In the second part of the article to be released in the next day or two, we will look at a recent Scottish report that provides what appears on first blush to be troubling data that some may falsely believe supports the claims in the paragraph above. But as we will see, the truth is good at hiding and can be a somewhat difficult beast to recognise, even when you’ve found it and it‘s staring you in the face.
Memberberries…
From as early as March 2020 in the United Kingdom we were constantly being told by the mainstream media and UK government that intensive care units were overwhelmed by Covid-19 patients...
Many of whom were also said to be dying...
Academic clinicians even sought to make a name for themselves writing research papers discussing the problem...
And recently the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) funded GAVI have continued fearmongering to create the belief that ICU beds were stretched to the limit...
…in order to create the misguided impression that vaccines we know do not prevent infection or transmission had ‘worked’.
Yet, buried in one Guardian article was this small yet tacit admission...
In that particular article they portray the appearance of ‘being overwhelmed’ on the simple issue that some intensive care resources were not located in the same locations as the Covid-19 patients that needed them.
Wow... So what happened to all the claims that operating theatres were repurposed to hold sometimes 3 or 4 covid patients on ventilators? What happened to the £530mil spent on building the largely unused Nightingale Hospitals (followed by many tens of millions to dismantle them, and with all that brand new untouched equipment disappearing into the hands of private contractors who made money coming AND going)?
For some of us, something just didn’t add up. There were so many scandals that were being brushed aside by the mainstream media at the time. For example:
Dido Harding’s multi-failure Track and Trace App had cost £37bn by March 2021, and continued to rack up another £17.2bn between March 2021 and March 2022 – for a total spend on a single software and service project of a remarkable £54.2bn!1
Dido Harding’s personal relationships and jobs-for-her-mates attitude saw Randox secure over £777mil for Covid-19 testing with test kits that were not sterile, with over three-quarters of a million test kits having to be destroyed (read: incinerated... how good must that have been for the environment?) and in a lab that Channel 4’s undercover reported clearly showed had serious failings in sample handling, testing processes and staff safety.
That over £4bn (one-third of all the money spent on PPE in the UK) was used to procure equipment that did not meet even basic health service standards and could not be used and, like those unsterile PCR test kits, was burnt by the government (again, another demonstration of how the Government are following their net zero climate nonsense)
And so, when the mainstream and social media ‘medical influencer’ claims that ICUs were full of pregnant women and so healthcare providers had to strongly foist the Covid-19 vaccination on pregnant women using fear of a dead baby to apply psychological pressure - it just felt like yet another scandal in the making.
Who were the doctors making these claims?
Viki Male
Let’s start with Victoria (Viki) Male. Viki is not an obstetrician yet she likes to tell you that if you are pregnant, Covid-19 is more than likely going to get you and the only way to prevent becoming infected and dying of Covid-19 is to get that shot! (You can watch her in a YouTube video here - note the pharmacist or bakers jacket to suggest she is a lab-coat wearing scientist).
She is essentially a pipette fondler – she works all day in a lab with test tubes and bunsen burners and is not actually, nor has ever been, an MD. She acknowledged recently on twitter that people have been mislead or confused about her status, that she is not employed or contracted by a hospital, not a medical doctor, and therefore not able to treat or prescribe to patients on a hospital ward. She has never been on the medical register.
Yet, she is not above allowing most of the Local Council’s in London to retweet her videos and in a way that definitely creates exactly that misconception…
Her eyes… so very passionate… reminds me of:2
Her twitter account is replete with examples of misguided and biased science™ wherein she makes similar and sometimes stronger recommendations of a prescribing nature. No healthcare provider, and certainly noone who like Viki lacks a medical qualification at all, should make treatment recommendations to a general audience like this, no matter what the subject matter or how passionately they feel about it. Treatment recommendations, and particularly those of a prescribing nature, should only be made once a qualified healthcare provider has seen, assessed, and taken a history from the patient.
She also regularly works on research that promotes the Covid-19 vaccines with other researchers who have strong financial ties to pharmaceutical companies and one of the world’s largest Covid-19 manufacturer shareholders, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. For example: Here and Here. She has also been outed as part of a Covid-19 vaccine disinformation crew, and of using scare tactic claims that you are going to die without the Covid-19 vaccine, to nudge pregnant women to get the jabs.
The PregCov-19 Living Systematic Review Consortium
Next, the PregCov-19 Living Systematic Review Consortium promoted vaccination for pregnant women - both on social media and in so-called ‘review papers’:
In their papers they denied any conflicts of interest – with a very specific and carefully worded competing interests statement. It said firstly (in yellow) that no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years, and second (in green) that no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
So, aside from mentioning that several authors have current funding from the World Health Organisation, who we shouldn’t forget receive billions of dollars each year from BMGF (one of the single largest Covid-19 vaccine manufacturer shareholders in the world), no author on the paper has received or worked with funding from Pfizer, Moderna, other pharma companies, or BMGF?
Let’s see...
Literally the first name I chose to search, senior author Professor Shakila Thangaratinam, is attached to a maternal health research project with the University of Birmingham that has significant funding from BMGF. And if you slide further down on that website there is a YouTube video of Prof. Thangaratinam discussing the project. So there’s no denying that she knew that within three years of the competing interests statement shown above, she HAD been a party to a financial relationship or activities that could appear to have influenced the work. However, she chose not to declare this.
Further, in 2020, again within three years of her competing interests declaration, she was involved in work for the World Health Organisation that was funded by and involved people from BMGF:
And she has been heavily involved in other studies that included prominent researchers funded by Pfizer (here and here)
Next, and while it was slightly outside the three years, the second-most senior author listed on the PregCov-19 Consortium paper, Professor Javier Zamora, had previously conducted research funded by and on behalf of Pfizer:
On at least TWO occasions:
And again, while a few years outside of the three years, co-author Lynn Mofenson had been part of the ethics review committee of a large scale long-term Pfizer-led Multi-Region Clinical Trial that was funded by Pfizer, the Fauci-led National Institutes for Health NIAID, and the Gates Foundation (here); a member of a BMGF and NIH NIAID-run HIV Research Working Group (here); claimed in the mainstream media to have virtually eliminated HIV transmissions (here); and all the while, while working for the NIH who own several of the key patents for both HIV retroviral drugs and the Covid-19 vaccines. As a walking conflict of interest, and by virtue of having been on ethics review boards, Ms Mofenson should have both known better...
...and had a flashing neon warning sign over her head.
I could go on at length about other members of the PregCov-19 Consortium and bore you to tears, suffice to say there were many current and historic conflicts of interest that lay undeclared behind their misleading and deceptive competing interest statement.
Kevin Ault
Kevin Ault has made a name for himself fearmongering that pregnant and postpartum mothers are getting seriously ill and dying with Covid-19 - on television (here) and on podcasts (here).
Even his LinkedIn profile starts with the claim: Pregnant and recently pregnant individuals (not women? because yeah, men can get pregnant according to Kevin) who become infected with Covid-19 are at high risk of requiring extra medical care. That statement could fit almost anyone… but I digress. Note that in the television link above, they do something Kevin himself rarely does - identify that Kevin is a member of the CDCs Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) - a committee that has single-mindedly recommended Covid-19 vaccination to younger and younger cohorts while hiding their significant conflicts of interest behind annual waivers that allow them to accept pharma and BMGF payouts and keep them secret from you, the general public.
It was recently revealed that Kevin, when voting on ACIP to vaccinate pregnant women and children, had undeclared conflicts of interest that included that his university lab had recieved over $18mil from BMGF - once again, one of the largest single Covid-19 vaccine manufacturer shareholders.
And in research where he was the senior author, he denies any conflicts of interest whilst admitting that BMGF gave an unrestricted grant to fund the whole thing…
And he is not above applauding and retweeting other Covid-19 vaccine promoting ‘medical influencers’ on our list…
Teresa Kelly
Another member of the same disinformation crews as Viki Male, Teresa has spent hours on Twitter promoting the Covid-19 vaccines and telling us how safe she believes they are.
However, as Arkmedic recently showed, Teresa’s claims, supported by Viki Male, that there was no increase in the miscarriage rate for Covid-19 vaccine recipients was misinformation…
Teresa has been mentioned on Pfizer’s own LinkedIn page, and is also not above completely irrelevant and shameless vaccine flag-waving in response to a serious post about the findings of a coronial investigation that may have brought her precious Covid-19 vaccines into question…
Note that While Dr Malhotra’s tweet references and links to evidence supporting his statement, Teresa’s includes no such evidence at all.
And while it is common knowledge that Dr Malhotra had been vaccinated for Covid-19, had a father who died after and possibly because of the Pfizer vaccine, and had been stood down and was not making an income from his investigation into the Covid-19 vaccines, Teresa would prefer you considered him corrupt, rather than the conflicted people, including herself, that we have looked at in today’s article.
In Conclusion
What we have seen here today is that there was considerable noise made by our governments, mainstream media and social media ‘medical influencers’ - who all had skin in the game. They all made claims that the incidence of unvaccinated pregnant women in ICU was as high as 1-in-6 ICU patients across the country, that pregnant and postpartum women were dying at as much as twice the national average, that the Covid-19 vaccines were not associated with miscarriage or other pregnancy-related serious adverse events or mortality, and that the only safe and effective way to prevent infection with Covid-19 was not to delay, and take one or more Covid-19 vaccine shots immediately.
Whether or not these claims are true, in the next post I will look at some of the data and both my own and other investigators analysis of what really happened. But I wanted you to at least have some idea of the background, conflicts of interest, potential for corruption and tactics used to foist the Covid-19 vaccines onto pregnant and expectant mothers.
The big question to keep in your mind is this…
Was it Covid-19 that put these women in the ICU… or something else?
Given the tall blue building that houses The Royal London Hospital only cost £1bil to build, that’s FIFTY-FOUR large brand spanking new London hospitals we could have built – and unlike The Royal London which we ‘lease’ and must return after 40 years for a total contract cost to the taxpayer of over £7bn under some ‘sweet deal’ with globalist banking magnates... we could have OWNED those 54 hospitals (https://bit.ly/3ZKcjnm )
For the unaware, the second image is famously known as Overly Attached Girlfriend - vlogger Laina Morris’s alter ego of a stereotypical overprotective and clingy girlfriend.
You’re welcome :-)
That pharma hooker is funded by the Wellcome Trust. Wellcome trust is majority owned by Glaxo and also owns shares in a bunch of colluded companies.
https://blogs.imperial.ac.uk/mdr/2019/09/25/funding-successes-august-and-september-2019/
https://wellcome.org/who-we-are/investments/direct-public-equity-holdings
I did some work on this topic back in December 2021. The ICU fatality rates did not make sense. Currently Pregnant: 3/281(ICU-FR: 1.1%)
Recently Pregnant: 11/230 (ICU-FR: 4.8%)
Not Pregnant: 185/1319 (ICU-FR: 14%)
https://communityoperatingsystem.wordpress.com/2021/12/09/uk-vaccine-propaganda-targeting-pregnant-women/