You would think that if any case deserved a review it would be one that you label the verdict as an "inference instruction". The Telegraph had an article about the appalling treatment of whistle-blowers that indicates that NHS management will go to immoral lengths to shut down any hints of structural failure or bad practice. The Post Office prosecuting with success innocent people should be a lesson but that lesson will be kept limited. Is it possible that the next case against Lucy could be used to expose the weakness of the evidence against her?
Interestingly, on his Facebook account Dr. Jayaram wrote people should watch the "Mr. Bates against the Postoffice" series. That amazed me. This series is about people who are accused of having committed crimes (they were supposed to have stolen money), they are innocent, but are not believed.
The post office scandal got a boost in favor of the victims after ITV made the series. But ITV already announced this will not happen again, they lost too much money on it. Despite the fact that it was their most watched program ever.
High-profile miscarriages of justice, and the years some spend wrongfully in prison, are signs that the system sometimes gets it dreadfully wrong. Unfortunately, these cases cannot be written off as a terrible but exceptional mistake, for miscarriages of justice are common and in most cases the victims of this corrupt system are left to suffer in silence with their lives left in ruins.- we don't get to hear about all these miscarriages of justice or the person at the heart of them.
Lucy Letby’s case has been plagued by serious failings at every turn. Hers is another reminder of the awesome power the state has to ruin people’s lives through corruption or incompetence. There is something seriously amiss in our justice system and the way it can produce, then fail to rectify, wrongful convictions. If a defendant has been wrongfully convicted, the appeals process is stacked against them. For Lucy, she has been denied a fair trial, denied appeal and denied a voice and my stomach churns for her. There is no such thing as openness and transparency, truth or justice in this grubby corrupt country, as I too found out:
Sometimes screaming at something seems a better response than any words. Whether that's a healthy response or not is another question.
There isn't much one can say about Lucy's travesty of justice that hasn't already been said. But your point about defence counsel competence (i.e. total lack of) is perhaps the most important. I think I've mentioned before that you have to actually put some effort in to be that incompetent - and that tells me, on a simple psychological level, that we are indeed talking 'conspiracy' here. In which case the question is what do they want to conceal? I don't think it can be mere NHS failings or even the incompetence of some of the specialists, because that's happening all over the country, everybody knows about it, and in any case can be used as a stick to beat the Tories with in order to facilitate the already-chosen successor (the Establishment asset Starmer) in an almost-certain-to-be-rigged election. The difference between the local election results (only 34 for labour) compared to the 'polls' (at least ten points higher) is a dead giveaway there. If the end result is anything like the polls, and we know the polls lie, then we know the election was rigged. I think they will do it by citing 'voter apathy' and removing millions of votes from postal, and ballot boxes (I reckon they did that in 2019 too - unless people really are stupid I simply can't believe nearly 14 million people voted for a lying scumbag like Johnson - same goes for Starmer).
As for Lucy, perhaps the only means left is to keep shouting about it, inform people about the real evidence, and get enough people also shouting about it. Once the forthcoming ancillary trial is done then sharing that new yorker article would be a good start. We can't rely on the MSM to publicise it so much, at least not in the UK, so public pressure is perhaps the only way.
I think you may be correct about changing to a wartime government. Even the radical left would agree with you - there was an article in the world socialist website the other day saying precisely the same thing - the establishment have chosen Starmer to be the wartime PM. Of course, when it all goes Pete Tong and Russia's hypersonic missiles send Britain back into the Dark Ages (literally, given all the power stations that will be taken out) and then 28 weeks later we're living in a military-run dictatorship with bands of roving starving rage zombies roaming the countryside at least the surviving Tories (in their bunkers) can say 'it was Labour wot done it, not us!'.
Bastards, the lot of them.
Unfortunately, a majority of the UK population are going to vote for the same bastards. Where have all the flowers gone?
Why type of country are we now living in? Just how did we get here? Truth, justice, and genuine evidence is lost, in favour of misinformation and manipulation, the way we sometimes felt it was in corrupt third world countries with depot dictators! What's left for Lucy? The Supreme Court? The Criminal Case Review Commission?
When are we going to get out of this horrid black hole, created by the madness of attention seeking 'clowns' unable to accept criticism and others trying to fill their boots with our money?
What's next? The biggest clown of all has been given back 'the whip', no doubt the WEF will glad about that and be eagerly setting out his role in the next act of inhumanity and treason! No names, one clue, Midazolam!
The supreme court has very narrow and specific criteria, usually if it's a matter concerning a large sector of the population- I don't think Lucy has much chance here.
CCRC is not fit for purpose and is incompetent
They won't want to lift the lid on this can of worms. Lucy is the sacrificial lamb here
As you say, just who would lift the lid off the can of worms and be able to deal with what they find. Never mind, there's lots of nurses to import from overseas and robots to take over healthcare....
My own reading of the UK government's prepper advice was that it was mostly about the inevitable power cuts as the grid moves towards Net Zero. The advice was presented as being for fire, flood or power cut but homes of elderly pensioners have been flooded (sic) over the last couple of months with checks (by post and phone) that there is still somebody living at the property who should get priority supply during a power cut.
A panel of experts has said the seven babies she was convicted of killing died from natural causes or poor care.
"We did not find any murders”. Those are the damning words of world-renowned neonatologist Dr Shoo Lee, one of a panel of experts questioning the evidence used against convicted child-killer Lucy Letby.
The seven babies were not murdered, they concluded from extensive new evidence, but died either from natural causes or poor medical care.
I shed a number of tears this morning when I heard Lucy’s bad news.
I know from a couple of minor civil hearings that the UK’s judicial are corrupt and will shut down anyone who questions the status quo.
The wilful ignorance and performative cruelty of the CJS is utterly shameful, and I can do nothing bit scream into the void.
Poor Lucy, thrown in a deep dark hole for ever, for things she is not guilty of, crimes that never even happened.
its just evil
Corrupt with a capital ‘C’. +++++++
You would think that if any case deserved a review it would be one that you label the verdict as an "inference instruction". The Telegraph had an article about the appalling treatment of whistle-blowers that indicates that NHS management will go to immoral lengths to shut down any hints of structural failure or bad practice. The Post Office prosecuting with success innocent people should be a lesson but that lesson will be kept limited. Is it possible that the next case against Lucy could be used to expose the weakness of the evidence against her?
With the defence team she presently has?
Interestingly, on his Facebook account Dr. Jayaram wrote people should watch the "Mr. Bates against the Postoffice" series. That amazed me. This series is about people who are accused of having committed crimes (they were supposed to have stolen money), they are innocent, but are not believed.
Yeah... it was a bit of an own goal!
The post office scandal got a boost in favor of the victims after ITV made the series. But ITV already announced this will not happen again, they lost too much money on it. Despite the fact that it was their most watched program ever.
Could it be a warning was given ?
It wouldn't surprise me
I bet it happens more times than we will ever know
High-profile miscarriages of justice, and the years some spend wrongfully in prison, are signs that the system sometimes gets it dreadfully wrong. Unfortunately, these cases cannot be written off as a terrible but exceptional mistake, for miscarriages of justice are common and in most cases the victims of this corrupt system are left to suffer in silence with their lives left in ruins.- we don't get to hear about all these miscarriages of justice or the person at the heart of them.
Lucy Letby’s case has been plagued by serious failings at every turn. Hers is another reminder of the awesome power the state has to ruin people’s lives through corruption or incompetence. There is something seriously amiss in our justice system and the way it can produce, then fail to rectify, wrongful convictions. If a defendant has been wrongfully convicted, the appeals process is stacked against them. For Lucy, she has been denied a fair trial, denied appeal and denied a voice and my stomach churns for her. There is no such thing as openness and transparency, truth or justice in this grubby corrupt country, as I too found out:
https://patientcomplaintdhcftdotcom.wordpress.com/
Sometimes screaming at something seems a better response than any words. Whether that's a healthy response or not is another question.
There isn't much one can say about Lucy's travesty of justice that hasn't already been said. But your point about defence counsel competence (i.e. total lack of) is perhaps the most important. I think I've mentioned before that you have to actually put some effort in to be that incompetent - and that tells me, on a simple psychological level, that we are indeed talking 'conspiracy' here. In which case the question is what do they want to conceal? I don't think it can be mere NHS failings or even the incompetence of some of the specialists, because that's happening all over the country, everybody knows about it, and in any case can be used as a stick to beat the Tories with in order to facilitate the already-chosen successor (the Establishment asset Starmer) in an almost-certain-to-be-rigged election. The difference between the local election results (only 34 for labour) compared to the 'polls' (at least ten points higher) is a dead giveaway there. If the end result is anything like the polls, and we know the polls lie, then we know the election was rigged. I think they will do it by citing 'voter apathy' and removing millions of votes from postal, and ballot boxes (I reckon they did that in 2019 too - unless people really are stupid I simply can't believe nearly 14 million people voted for a lying scumbag like Johnson - same goes for Starmer).
As for Lucy, perhaps the only means left is to keep shouting about it, inform people about the real evidence, and get enough people also shouting about it. Once the forthcoming ancillary trial is done then sharing that new yorker article would be a good start. We can't rely on the MSM to publicise it so much, at least not in the UK, so public pressure is perhaps the only way.
I think you may be correct about changing to a wartime government. Even the radical left would agree with you - there was an article in the world socialist website the other day saying precisely the same thing - the establishment have chosen Starmer to be the wartime PM. Of course, when it all goes Pete Tong and Russia's hypersonic missiles send Britain back into the Dark Ages (literally, given all the power stations that will be taken out) and then 28 weeks later we're living in a military-run dictatorship with bands of roving starving rage zombies roaming the countryside at least the surviving Tories (in their bunkers) can say 'it was Labour wot done it, not us!'.
Bastards, the lot of them.
Unfortunately, a majority of the UK population are going to vote for the same bastards. Where have all the flowers gone?
Why type of country are we now living in? Just how did we get here? Truth, justice, and genuine evidence is lost, in favour of misinformation and manipulation, the way we sometimes felt it was in corrupt third world countries with depot dictators! What's left for Lucy? The Supreme Court? The Criminal Case Review Commission?
When are we going to get out of this horrid black hole, created by the madness of attention seeking 'clowns' unable to accept criticism and others trying to fill their boots with our money?
What's next? The biggest clown of all has been given back 'the whip', no doubt the WEF will glad about that and be eagerly setting out his role in the next act of inhumanity and treason! No names, one clue, Midazolam!
The supreme court has very narrow and specific criteria, usually if it's a matter concerning a large sector of the population- I don't think Lucy has much chance here.
CCRC is not fit for purpose and is incompetent
They won't want to lift the lid on this can of worms. Lucy is the sacrificial lamb here
As you say, just who would lift the lid off the can of worms and be able to deal with what they find. Never mind, there's lots of nurses to import from overseas and robots to take over healthcare....
My own reading of the UK government's prepper advice was that it was mostly about the inevitable power cuts as the grid moves towards Net Zero. The advice was presented as being for fire, flood or power cut but homes of elderly pensioners have been flooded (sic) over the last couple of months with checks (by post and phone) that there is still somebody living at the property who should get priority supply during a power cut.
Finally:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/02/04/the-daily-t-new-evidence-medical-experts-lucy-letby/
A panel of experts has said the seven babies she was convicted of killing died from natural causes or poor care.
"We did not find any murders”. Those are the damning words of world-renowned neonatologist Dr Shoo Lee, one of a panel of experts questioning the evidence used against convicted child-killer Lucy Letby.
The seven babies were not murdered, they concluded from extensive new evidence, but died either from natural causes or poor medical care.
Sounds very much like the Sally Clark case.