Perhaps I'm getting cynical in my old age but I fully expect lawyers for AZ to roll out so called "experts" like Spiegelhalter who will continue to claim the "risks of Covid itself are greater than the very rare side effects of the 'vaccines'", and that the judge will be "pressurized" to take that view or else all hell will break out in terms of liability payments to the vaccine injured as well as opening a can or worms about who lied about the safety, when and why. Liability would be paid by the UK government of course rather than by AZ themselves.... ie. taxpayers pay in the end, as usual. I live in hope for an honest outcome but I fear the worst
Sir David Winton Harding who funded it made his fortune in understanding risk in investment markets. He wouldn’t have made a cent if he’d employed DS in that role.
The other thing Cambridge are quiet about is the fact that they received over £210mil from Gates Foundation funds that at times was used to provide buildings for such centres as Winton, AND was used to fund the PhD fees and research of some of Speig's students... https://www.student-funding.cam.ac.uk/fund/gates-cambridge-scholarship-2022
All these historical and current examples of pharma malpractice and still 'they' turn deaf ears to the suffering these products have caused. As posited, what is 'rare'? I'd say under 5, and I'd not want to be in that expressed 'rarity'. My MP falls back on the hundreds of million doses given makes the dozens of fatalities we know about( likely hundreds) a rare outcome. How blasé are these politicians with their definitions. She emphasised that most people were contacting her about when they could get "'their vaccine", not about any possible downsides to them. Well, that is the power of propaganda. That 24/7 propaganda was riddled with fraudulent claims - Fraud by Misrepresentation - " safe and effective", "stops transmission" etc, until the propaganda was shifted to " prevents hospitalisation and death", even if "granny" gets infected.
Shiny smiling Sunak with his new Cabinet ( of contemptibles) wants this all buried and forgotten - NEVER! Too many lives destroyed or disabled.
In case it's passed some people's notice, most think AZ was a British invention and manufactured here, but it's also made in a number of countries worldwide including India but one notable factory is in Maryland USA, by the company "Emergent BioSolutions". This is the same company that also produced the "similar" J+J "vaccine", (also adenovirus technology) which "coincidentally" also suffered from clotting issues and has been withdrawn from use for that reason. Oddly AZ was never authorised for use in America despite being made there, it's a tangled web
Perhaps I'm getting cynical in my old age but I fully expect lawyers for AZ to roll out so called "experts" like Spiegelhalter who will continue to claim the "risks of Covid itself are greater than the very rare side effects of the 'vaccines'", and that the judge will be "pressurized" to take that view or else all hell will break out in terms of liability payments to the vaccine injured as well as opening a can or worms about who lied about the safety, when and why. Liability would be paid by the UK government of course rather than by AZ themselves.... ie. taxpayers pay in the end, as usual. I live in hope for an honest outcome but I fear the worst
DS was still gaslighting the public last week when the news came out. In the Telegraph they quoted a 1 in 50,000 risk of blood clots.
I see that the Winton Centre has been shut down.
https://wintoncentre.maths.cam.ac.uk/
Sir David Winton Harding who funded it made his fortune in understanding risk in investment markets. He wouldn’t have made a cent if he’d employed DS in that role.
The other thing Cambridge are quiet about is the fact that they received over £210mil from Gates Foundation funds that at times was used to provide buildings for such centres as Winton, AND was used to fund the PhD fees and research of some of Speig's students... https://www.student-funding.cam.ac.uk/fund/gates-cambridge-scholarship-2022
All these historical and current examples of pharma malpractice and still 'they' turn deaf ears to the suffering these products have caused. As posited, what is 'rare'? I'd say under 5, and I'd not want to be in that expressed 'rarity'. My MP falls back on the hundreds of million doses given makes the dozens of fatalities we know about( likely hundreds) a rare outcome. How blasé are these politicians with their definitions. She emphasised that most people were contacting her about when they could get "'their vaccine", not about any possible downsides to them. Well, that is the power of propaganda. That 24/7 propaganda was riddled with fraudulent claims - Fraud by Misrepresentation - " safe and effective", "stops transmission" etc, until the propaganda was shifted to " prevents hospitalisation and death", even if "granny" gets infected.
Shiny smiling Sunak with his new Cabinet ( of contemptibles) wants this all buried and forgotten - NEVER! Too many lives destroyed or disabled.
The mechanisms for harm from AAV vectors have been known since 2007:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17148587/
As soon as the first case was seen, alarm bells should have rung
In case it's passed some people's notice, most think AZ was a British invention and manufactured here, but it's also made in a number of countries worldwide including India but one notable factory is in Maryland USA, by the company "Emergent BioSolutions". This is the same company that also produced the "similar" J+J "vaccine", (also adenovirus technology) which "coincidentally" also suffered from clotting issues and has been withdrawn from use for that reason. Oddly AZ was never authorised for use in America despite being made there, it's a tangled web
Great read, thanks a lot :)
Since we're discussing the AstraZeneca jab, I used a UK reference for rare diseases. It means occurrence in 1 per 2000 people (or less).
https://www.raredisease.org.uk/what-is-a-rare-disease/