Two days ago I posted here regarding the fact that now even the preprint servers are using arbitrary rules to censor academics…
Let’s recap…
Members of Professor Fenton’s team had seen the same paper rejected twice by MedRxiv in the days leading up to that post… for a reason that, as I assert in the excerpt above, was most likely unequally applied rules intended to enable MedRxiv’s editors’ ability for censorship.
I have just been advised today that, without their having changed anything in the manuscript since my substack post, MedRxiv have changed their mind and sent the following missive to Professor Fenton’s team:
Does this prove my assertion?
Thanks for this update!