If I had a dollar for every prediction I’ve made that came true on the Lucy Letby trial evidence and testimony, I would have enough to replace my recently broken iPad Pro at this point.
Baby F
I am still working through the clinical exhibits for Baby F but…
Remember how I mentioned in my article on Baby E that it is common that if one twin has a glucose management issue, the other one very likely does too?
One of the big revelations of my Baby F article that I am working on today is exactly this.
Baby F, the baby they say was not prescribed insulin and that therefore if there was synthetic insulin in his blood stream it was because Lucy poisoned him?
Yeah… about that.
Baby F had, exactly as I predicted, been hyperglycaemic… and…
He HAD been prescribed insulin.
Stay tuned…
Incredible that the defence did not pick up on this? And even more incredible are those who clamour "yeah, but, she was found guilty in a court of law, so...". They had better hope they don't find themselves in a similar position...
This fitted your previous post better but I get in first comment here! I find this news outrageous, destroying a lot of faith in at least some of those heroes of the NHS.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-66775015
Lesser status women, and women are by definition lesser status to start with, can get a raw deal. Relevant?